TOW # 25 Image

This image shows are large hairy man eating fast food, smoking, and drinking beer screaming about the dangers of Ebola. He represents the fear in the USA about the Ebola virus, when in actuality the real dangers to the people's lives are already all around us. This advertisement's use of statistics of yearly death causes appeals to logos, giving reason as to why these household killers are of more relevance than an African virus that has killed 2 people so far. This large man's disproportionate head is also meant to appeal to the reader's sense of pathos as well. His shaved, neckless head is stereotypical of a buffoon and his actions show it. This picture captures the American fears that some new/uncommon danger to people are going to kill us all, when really, the easiest way to die has been with us the whole time.

TOW #17 IRB

              In Malcom Gladwell’s outliers, Gladwell in the epilogue of his book, decides to talk about his own life, and his mother’s “Success” story. This was done through very anecdotal means of him telling the story of his own family. Though the story was most likely biased or embellished, it was most likely there to appeal to pathos. It was meant for the average person. The rest of the book had talked about the right people at the right time who worked hard enough to get the right result, but not everyone has the right place, or the right brain. This epilogue was trying to show that everyone has a story of success, no matter how much is against you. It may not be as grand as Bill Gates or Steve Jobs, you may not play hockey for professional Canadian leagues, but Gladwell wants his audience to not end the book feeling alienated. He tries to keep people feeling like they are able to accomplish things in their life, that they don’t need luck.

Gladwell also incorporates the device of rhetorical questions into his writing. During the beginning of the epilogue, he keeps things vague on purpose, and he asks the reader questions that they are not capable of having the answers to. At first the reader may be confused but it again, appeals to pathos once the connection is made between Gladwell and his parents. Gladwell writes this ending to qualify his own point. He does not deny anything he said previously, but he does not want to leave his readers feeling hopeless in their life achievements. 

TOW #18 The Writing Life By: Stephen King

Stephen King, renowned horror writer, has written this piece to share his experiences with writer’s block. King demonstrates this through a personal experience with is by appealing to our sense of pathos. He describes himself at a park with his corgi. Occasionally he will get a person talking to him about his dog, but overall nothing significant about him being a famous author ever comes up. It appears that this article is meant to discuss writer’s block and what it is exactly. He describes the muse that motivates and inspires people to write as something that can be there then disappear almost instantly. He further shows this through his use of allusion. He references the book Catch-22, and how it took several years to release the sequel due to the author suffering from writer’s block. Furthermore, Stephen King describes his piece in a very neutral way. He does not have a set opinion he is attempting to push. No negative imagery, nor positive. He sets out a very dull and grey view of how a writer lives. No high points or low points are necessarily expanded upon. He merely shows his everyday life. It’s almost as if King is attempting to describe the life of a writer as a quaint, and boring one. Nothing great about it.

TOW # 24 Die, Selfish Gene, Die By: David Dobbs

In this essay, Dobbs explores the world of evolution and why Dawkin’s idea of the “selfish gene” should not exist. He does so by organizing his essay into 4 main parts. First, he gives an example of the Grasshopper/locust in order to hook the reader with an interesting bit of knowledge. It also adds to his statement later denouncing the rigidity of the selfish gene’s existence. Then Dobbs goes on to explain what the selfish gene entails exactly and why it does not make sense based on his previous statements made about genetics in general. Finally he goes on to explain why the selfish gene has been wrongfully accepted into the biological field. Dobb’s organization is very powerful and makes the overall essay easy to read on a holistic standpoint. By introducing a common idea, Dobbs eases his reader in, then he defines the selfish gene so the audience can clearly understand his view on why it is illogical. Once he has already proven it to be false, it is the perfect time to then speak of the final part. The final part of his essay is definitely the weakest, providing little concrete evidence, and mainly made up of conjecture, but is compensated for by the ethos and logos previously showcased in the essay.

Dobbs also is very anecdotal, when talking about the story of Mendel. This makes the reading turn from a dry history lecture into an interesting story-time excursion. This appeals to pathos, and makes the reading a more enjoyable experience. Dobbs manages to turn what could have been a boring and overly-jargonized piece of niche literature into an essay that is relatively accessible while also being effective in his main purpose. 

TOW #19 Fanboys by Lessley Anderson

On the Verge, Lessley Anderson describes her experiences and interviews professionals in order to understand the fanboy mentality. Specifically towards smartphones. Anderson uses many testimonial evidences to try and clarify where fanboys come from. What makes them so extreme? Etc, etc. She uses many internet hosted pros such as Michael Fischer and Aaron Baker, very prolific and very popular geeks in the smartphone space. Anderson also uses many rhetorical questions as transitions in order to improve the flow of her writing. Questions like, "But smartphones?" and "So why do it?" allows Anderson to lead the reader into directions that aren't necessarily related to what she was just talking about, but still important to the overall article. She uses these questions as a way to control the pace and the flow. Anderson has complete control over her writing and it allows her to explain what she wants when she wants, whether for dramatic effect or humor. She also makes use of anonymous Twitter tweets in order to strengthen her position. By using random, unprofessional quotes as evidence of her point, it makes the overall read much lighter feeling and nuanced, as opposed to something dry and overly official sounding you would find in filibustered  politics.

Lessley is very clear, very controlling and at the same time, very unsure. She lacks a solid viewpoint on the topic, which for an informational piece is fine, but by the end the "so what?" does not really get to me. I'm only left with the opinion that fanboys are bad, but sometimes can't help being bad. There is a lack of self-reflection I get to achieve on my own.

But again, as an informational piece, not a persuasive or argumentative one, the lack of necessity makes it a minor flaw in an overall great essay.

TOW #20 Image

This image attempts to advertise Nictotinell by showing a very old, tar-covered woman. She looks like she should be 80, but the birthday cake says otherwise, being almost half that age. By using this form of analogy, the photo appeals to pathos by scaring the smokers that see the image. It's meant to act as a wake-up call to people who smoke tobacco and is meant to have them then buy Nicotinell to try and fix their problem. The image also makes use of showing how ridiculous and stupid it looks to be a smoker. In the photo, when the woman should be trying to blow out the melting candles (as per birthday cake tradition) but instead she is attempting to light a cigarette on the flame from the candles. This is a metaphor for how smoking is so difficult to stop, again advising people they need Nicotinell.  It shows that the woman in the photo has such an addiction, she is using her cake instead of eating her cake. A normally happy tradition is now being manipulated to fuel someones dopamine tank in their brain. This woman does not look happy, nor does her body look healthy. This woman is addicted and you can visually see what it has done to her body. Tuberculosis, Lung Cancer, Heart attack, Stroke, and countless other diseases all have the risk factor increased by simply smoking tobacco products. Nicotinell is trying to help those people as well as make money. Whether or not the audience will listen to this one photo, will depend on the individual, but those that are far too addicted already will at least have the idea in their heads.